Without Enjoyphoenix, ‘anti-radiation patches’ have no health benefits

Without Enjoyphoenix, 'anti-radiation patches' have no health benefits


Influencer Enjoyphoenix has created a paid partnership to promote “anti-radiation patches” on its Instagram account. Problem: the health benefit of these stickers has not been proven. They could even be harmful.

This is a paid collaboration that will probably cause more headaches in Enjoyphoenix than the waves emitted by smartphones. Indeed, the famous influencer was found to promote a product whose health benefits have not yet been scientifically proven. A gadget that is presented as capable of reducing or canceling the symptoms attributed to the waves, just like headaches.

Enjoyphoenix Fazup story
One of the Enjoyphoenix stories promoted by Fazup. // Source: Enjoyphoenix

What happened ? On the night of May 4, 2022, the French youtuber and instagrammer, who in political life is called Marie Lopez, shared several “stories” on her personal account. These “stories”, which are ephemeral content visible for 24 hours, are mainly dedicated to a Swiss company, Fazup, whose specialty is to make “patches against the waves”. Or at least, patches presented as such.

In all, Enjoyphoenix shared nine stories on its Instagram account praising the supposed benefits of this patch. ” Fazup is not a simple sticker, but a passive antenna that sticks precisely to the antenna of your mobile thanks to the installation tool provided. Regulates the emission of mobile waves at the source and reduces your exposure, but does not eliminate 100% of the waves “, We can for example read in an insert that accompanies the words of the influencer.

Everything else is up to date. The problem, unfortunately for Enjoyphoenix as well as for Internet users who mistakenly trust this paid collaboration (the amount of the contract between influencer and Fazup is not public. We only know that the Internet users it manages to convert will be entitled at a 20% reduction using a password on the merchant’s website), is that these patches have not proven to be effective.

It is normal for smartphones to transmit waves, since these are wireless connections

First, a note: we must remember that if smartphones are not physically connected via cable to a relay antenna or Internet box, they are obliged to communicate differently. This is where radio waves come into play: it is normal for smartphones to send and receive them, as they are wireless telecommunications. A radiation patch that will also block 100% of the waves would also create some minor communication problems.

These waves compose what is called an electromagnetic spectrum. It is an invisible and invisible field that surrounds us and penetrates us. It is found everywhere. Light is part of it. X-rays as well, as well as ultraviolet, infrared and, of course, radio waves. Thanks to this range we can have wireless connections (Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, 4G, 5G etc.). These waves have different properties (frequency, energy, wavelength).

These established proverbs, Do these patches have any health benefits? The answer ranges from a steady and overwhelming “no” and “the health benefit has not been proven”, at best, to “it could even prove rather harmful” at worst. Radiation equipment in general and Fazup patches in particular have already been the subject of several verification and demystification publications. In short, it is useless, and leads to fear and lack of knowledge of technology.

Smartphones are not connected to wired relay antennas, and this is normal: data travels through specific waves.  // Source: Louise Audry for Numerama
Smartphones are not connected to wired relay antennas, and this is normal: data travels through specific waves. // Source: Louise Audry for Numerama

In a FAQ dedicated to exposing the public to the waves, the National Frequency Agency (whose mission is to verify that the exposure level complies with the regulations) explains that ” Anti-radiation devices intended to be placed on or near the antenna of the mobile phone do not present significant protection efficiency for all mobile phones and frequency bands tested. »

It should be noted that this service has the ability to detect any exceedance or deviation from the levels set by the regulations. When this happens, it may require the manufacturer to adjust the transmission power with an update (this happens from time to time). It may also require the withdrawal of certain products, including a smartphone. The Razer Phone 2 was recalled because it emitted too many waves.

The National Frequency Agency also refers to the work carried out in 2013 by the National Agency for Food Safety, Environment and Occupational Health (Anses) on the subject. Thirteen devices were tested and the conclusions were very clear: Anti-radiation devices intended to be placed on or near the mobile phone antenna do not have significant protection efficiency for all mobile phones and frequency bands tested. Therefore, no conclusion can be drawn as to their effectiveness in reducing the DAS level. »

Based on these findings, the Directorate-General for Competition, Consumer Affairs and Fraud Prevention (DGCCRF) conducted a survey in 2015 on the market conditions for “anti-radiation” devices for mobile phones. The sale of this equipment is often accompanied by multiple claims that need to be verified. Most of them have no basis.

Smartphones are subject to very specific regulatory limits for maintaining health

SAR, acronym for “specific absorption rate”, is a numerical indicator used to quantify the energy of waves emitted by radioactive equipment absorbed by the human body. The lower this index, the better. This indicator is public: it is on the sheet of every smartphone, along with its other technical features. Allows the public to display the SAR intensity for each model.

In France there are several SAR limits and the rule is, of course, not to exceed them. The measurement is in watts per kilo (W / kg). It is 2 W / kg for the head and the torso, ie the torso. It is 4 W / kg for the ends. These measurements are made at a distance of just a few millimeters, in order to record as accurately as possible the exposure of a person in the telephony process, having it in his pocket or in his hand.

Health 5G
The advent of 5G, the latest generation of mobile telephony, has also raised questions about health. Its harmfulness to health has not been proven. // Source: Melvyn Dadure for Numerama

The question therefore remains: how were these limit values ​​of 2 and 4 W / kg chosen? In fact, they come from the work of the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, an international non-governmental organization made up of independent scientific experts. These prices were set in 1998, but can be revised if necessary. It has already happened, without questioning the previous context.

With the simplification in wide touches, the thresholds were designed in two stages. There was first a phase of experimentation, to detect a thermal effect (a heating of the tissues, in net) due to the waves. Based on this observation, a regulatory threshold was set. This limit is fifty times lower than what has been measured in the laboratory. This is an important safety margin that serves to cover potential scientific uncertainties.

Therefore, at this regulatory limit, fifty times lower than what could be detected in the laboratory, the specific absorption rate was designed. Therefore, at this level the National Frequency Agency intervenes to adjust the signal strength with the manufacturers. The agency has other missions, always connected to the airwaves. For example, she is very busy with 5G and Linky counters, but has not found anything to worry about, despite the concerns that may have sprung up on social media.

Clearly, population exposure to waves is generally low in France. From time to time there may be informal cases, deviations and exceedances of limits, but these are subject to checks and corrections. In the case of laptops, this translates into software updates and, in more serious cases, product withdrawal and, sometimes, a fine against the manufacturer.

Wave patches whose effectiveness has not been proven and which may be counterproductive

In any case, Enjoyphoenix is ​​not the only public figure or influence convinced by these anti-radiation patches. According to journalist Raphaël Grably, Fazup was able to rely on Louise Chabat, influential “new mothers” and daughter of actor Alain Chabat, to transmit his communication. A BFM TV survey also showed Fazup’s strategy to scare young mothers into selling anti-radiation pads.

As noted in the 2020 article, Fazup does not provide any information on the health effects of its products. Asked about this, the two founders of Fazup then admitted that they had not provided any evidence of the health benefits of this sticker. They admitted that they played half a word in the words: ” We write for example that our product eliminates the feeling of a headache, not that it eliminates the headaches. »

Also in 2020, Stéphane Marty, a microelectronics engineer and videographer from the Deus Ex Silicium channel, who is just interested in how devices work, analyzing in all sorts of ways, posted a video in which he analyzes and tests a Fazup patch for a smartphone. And the conclusions of these measurements are not at all flattering.

In fact, this is the whole paradox of these devices that are presented as antidotes: these patches even seem counterproductive, even rather harmful to health. As some of these products prevent the waves from spreading diffusely during normal operation, smartphones, noticing a difficulty in connecting a signal to the relay antenna, emit more waves to overcome the obstacle.

This was pointed out by ANSES in its opinion in 2013. Fuses that modify the performance of mobile phone radios, for example by degrading reception capabilities, risk increasing the user’s exposure level under real-world conditions of use. In other words, this kind of patch does not allow the waves to escape naturally: on the contrary, it creates focal points, based on the increased intensity, which is more harmful. Absurd.

Source: Numerama


Source link

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.